Private preview. We run the benchmarks for you.Request access →
For Platform & DevEx

What should Platform teams standardize for coding agents?

You already version CI config, toolchains and dev environments. The coding agent setup every team shares changes just as often, usually without a version number or a test. Fullbeam gives each version a name and a benchmark.

In practice

What this looks like on your code

Every result links back to the setup, the tasks and the commit it came from. If something wasn't measured, you see that too, instead of a number that looks complete.

01

Name the whole default

Record the model, agent, instructions, skills, tools, permissions and checks as one versioned setup, like backend-tools@18. When something regresses six months later, you can see which version produced which results.

02

Benchmark before teams adopt it

Run the current default and the new one on tasks from the repos they'll affect. Same starting commit, same tests, same rules for what counts as a pass.

03

Keep more than one good default

Routine maintenance and database migrations may need different setups. Your standard can include several, each with a clear list of the work it covers, instead of one choice forced on every repo and team.

04

Turn failures into tasks

When an agent change goes wrong and someone merges the fix, that PR can become a task. The next default has to pass it before another team gets it.

Got a coding agent change coming up?

Fullbeam tells you which kinds of work should move to the new version. GitOps, MDM or your internal platform still deploys it.

Your current setupThe change you want to tryPRs you already mergedAn answer for each kind of work

Help us improve Fullbeam

Allow privacy-safe product analytics. We do not send prompts, code, repository names, email addresses, or session replays.