What a passing task costs
Fullbeam divides the model and runtime cost of every valid attempt, failures and retries included, by the tasks that passed. Engineer time isn't included, and the report says so.
For Engineering Leadership
Know where a new agent setup is worth it
Your agent spend keeps growing, and the vendor dashboard shows seats and tokens. It can't tell you whether the next setup will get your team's work done, in your repos, to your standards. Fullbeam benchmarks that on your merged PRs, one kind of work at a time, and says plainly what it couldn't measure.
In practice
What this looks like on your code
Every result links back to the setup, the tasks and the commit it came from. If something wasn't measured, you see that too, instead of a number that looks complete.
No single company-wide answer
A new setup can be ready for a small rollout on routine maintenance, stay off database migrations, and stay under review for security-sensitive work until there are enough tasks to judge.
Savings you can defend
Projected savings appear only when there is enough behind them: your real spend, how much of that work you do, and enough results. Otherwise it shows Unavailable.
Keep the decision trail
Each call your team makes, to widen, restrict, override or roll back, stays linked to the setup version, the commits, the excluded tasks and the results behind it.
Got a coding agent change coming up?
Spend less where the cheaper setup does the same work. Keep the stronger one where the cheaper option fails too often. During the private preview, results are advisory, and your team makes the call.
Your current setupThe change you want to tryPRs you already mergedAn answer for each kind of work