Private preview · Invitation-only managed qualificationRequest access →
Fullbeam
Solution / Cost Migration

How do you reduce coding-agent costs without increasing review and rework?

A model that costs 40% less per token can still cost more to ship with once steering, failed checks, and reviewer corrections enter the path. Fullbeam compares both Stack Releases on repeated private work and reports observed attempt cost per accepted-task equivalent without inventing missing engineering-effort data.

What the release gate checks

The evidence behind the decision

Each result stays tied to the Stack Release, workload, repository state, and coverage that produced it. If evidence is missing, the gap remains visible in the release call.

01

Token price is one line of the bill

Measure observed model and runtime spend per accepted-task equivalent. Show engineer steering, retries, fallback calls, CI recovery, review changes, rework, and abandoned attempts separately, including unavailable states.

02

Draw the boundary by workload

A candidate may match the baseline on backend maintenance and fail three database migrations, and Fullbeam keeps those outcomes separate instead of averaging them into one flattering score.

03

Put the saving through a canary

Prepare a canary only for workloads that passed. Production route, outcomes, cost, and engineering effort require their own observed evidence before broader promotion.

04

Wait for enough data before forecasting

Annualized savings stay unavailable until baseline spend, eligible workload volume, outcome coverage, and cost attribution support the number. If those inputs are missing, the forecast stays blank.

Bring us the next stack change

Move the workloads that keep the saving. Leave migrations, authentication, or any weakly covered class on the current release until the evidence changes.

One current releaseOne candidatePrivate repository workA workload-level decision